-
11-13-2005 08:32 PM #1
65 falcon
I have a 65 falcon I am going to try to put a 351c with 2 4s with a 350 turbo I was told i might have problms with the steering. I have an 89 mustang 5.0 parts car should i check in to putting the mustang front clip under the falcon. I was thanking a straight axle would be cool what would it take to put a straight under the falcon. any ideas
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
11-14-2005 12:02 AM #2
I dropped a 302 in a 68 with no problems, if that gives you any help at all..
Education is expensive. Keep that in mind, and you'll never be terribly upset when a project goes awry.
EG
-
11-14-2005 03:54 AM #3
A Falcon is a unibody, first thing it would take is a frame.Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
11-14-2005 05:52 PM #4
would i have to build a frame or could i use one from another car
-
11-14-2005 05:56 PM #5
there should be a way to use frame stiffeners and everything for a '65 mustang as the falcon and mustangs are the same chassie. I'v seen 351's in pre '69 mustangs b4You don't know what you've got til it's gone
Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver
1967 Ford Falcon- Sold
1930's styled hand built ratrod project
1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold
-
11-15-2005 08:32 PM #6
351 c falcon
I put a 351 c in a 64 falcon.It fit pretty tight,but if you cut the inside of each fenderwell off from about one inch above the a arms bolts and put a steel plate in theres plenty of room,i took out the top engine bay struts and made bolt in ones, also i made a crossmember to connect the lower a arm mounting points together under the oil pan.i took a 67 mustang one and made it fit,i used the stock exaust manifols just had to grind some excess casting material off I hope this helps larry
-
02-11-2006 05:34 PM #7
Looks like you have a couple of options. The easy way is to loose the shock towers. You could install a straight axle or IFS. The straight would be cheaper but it's still old school. I've been knocking around the idea myself. I have a 65 Ranchero and I have been wanting to get rid of those annoying shock towers. I think the straight axle with a spring over in the rear would be cool, but I'm old school to start anyway. I have a 302 currently and believe me theres not much room exhaust wise. Make up your mind and enjoy!!!.
-
02-11-2006 05:37 PM #8
I'm building my '67 Ranchero with the shock towers delete option, hate battling them **!!!#* things everytime you want to touch the motor!!!!!!Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
Welcome to Club Hot Rod! The premier site for
everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more.
- » Members from all over the US and the world!
- » Help from all over the world for your questions
- » Build logs for you and all members
- » Blogs
- » Image Gallery
- » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts!
YES! I want to register an account for free right now! p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show
I wanted to complain about this NZ slang business, but I see it was resolved before it mattered. LOL..
the Official CHR joke page duel