Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Frames
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    bonin87's Avatar
    bonin87 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    DavenporT
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1973 Dodge Charger
    Posts
    5

    Frames

     



    How hard is it to use a s10 frame for a frame for a Model A or tudor?

  2. #2
    Bob Parmenter's Avatar
    Bob Parmenter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Salado
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32, 40 Fords,
    Posts
    10,869

    Not all that hard. Here's what it looks like.
    Attached Images
    Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon

    It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.

    Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.

  3. #3
    robot's Avatar
    robot is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tucson
    Car Year, Make, Model: 39 Ford Coupe, 32 Ford Roadster
    Posts
    2,334

    Bob, this picture should be required by law to be attached to every S10 frame ever sold so people could see what the end result looks like.

    Also, every amateur painter in the country should get a copy of the picture to look at the door vs the quarter

  4. #4
    Don Meyer is offline Moderator Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    St Cloud
    Car Year, Make, Model: 48 GMC trk & a 66 Rolls Royce
    Posts
    532

    Bob, It appears that the S-10 frame in the picture was shortened. I believe that the S-10 frame(std. cab) is 6" longer than the Model A.

    This was caused by the builders warped idea of what the car should look like.

    May your worst days of 06 be better than your best days of 05..........Don
    Don Meyer, PhD-Mech Engr(48 GMC Trk/chopped/cab extended/caddy fins & a GM converted Rolls Royce Silver Shadow).

  5. #5
    robot's Avatar
    robot is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tucson
    Car Year, Make, Model: 39 Ford Coupe, 32 Ford Roadster
    Posts
    2,334

    Don, you are correct. The S10 frame mounts the engine forward and near the front axle centerline. The Model A mounts the engine further to the rear relative to the axle centerline.

    Thus, the builder needed to move the engine back out of the radiator.....so he (she) shortened the frame to move the engine back....duh, the front wheels moved back at the same time.

    This is a great picture that Bob posted....a classic (the picture, not the car).

    mike in tucson

  6. #6
    Bob Parmenter's Avatar
    Bob Parmenter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Salado
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32, 40 Fords,
    Posts
    10,869

    I don't know the car personally Don, but I believe you are correct. What this demonstrates is the builder, in an effort to do the job "on the cheap" didn't want to relocate the engine within the frame, so in putting the rear of the engine in relation to the firewall, ended up with the spindle centerline way too far back. I suspect the same happened in the rear, trying to keep the spring hangers in stock location caused the rear axle to be too far forward.

    As for '06 wishes, may yours be even better than mine! And Merry Christmas.
    Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon

    It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.

    Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.

  7. #7
    Bob Parmenter's Avatar
    Bob Parmenter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Salado
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32, 40 Fords,
    Posts
    10,869

    Stereo there Mike! (see time stamp)
    Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon

    It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.

    Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.

  8. #8
    robot's Avatar
    robot is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tucson
    Car Year, Make, Model: 39 Ford Coupe, 32 Ford Roadster
    Posts
    2,334

    I beat you 'cause I'm on a T1 line....our electrons are faster?

    I need to copy this picture....it can be used many times.

    Thanks

    Mike

  9. #9
    RodLand's Avatar
    RodLand is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Car Year, Make, Model: 30 Ford Hi Boy
    Posts
    12

    I am not sure but I think what they are trying to say is,IT DON'T WORK.

    It might be done on a pickup but not a car.(as in A model) works ok on a fat fender car.
    I don't care how rich people do it!

  10. #10
    Bob Parmenter's Avatar
    Bob Parmenter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Salado
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32, 40 Fords,
    Posts
    10,869

    Originally posted by RodLand
    It might be done on a pickup but not a car.(as in A model) works ok on a fat fender car.
    You're correct in that the odds are better on a bigger car, but it's still not just a swap and go deal. The double shame on this one is it looks like he's put some serious time into body work.
    Attached Images
    Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon

    It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.

    Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.

  11. #11
    paul274854 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Midland park
    Car Year, Make, Model: 48 Ford Conv,54 Ford Vict
    Posts
    193

    It seems that lately everyone thinks an S-10 frame is the answer to all their problems? Why? If they are looking for an independent front end, the MII is the best way to go in an early car (disc brakes, rack and pinion steering). Motor mounts in most stock frames are a no brainer. Even a late front clip is probably better, but still a lot of work on resetting the front end sheetmetal.

  12. #12
    Don Meyer is offline Moderator Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    St Cloud
    Car Year, Make, Model: 48 GMC trk & a 66 Rolls Royce
    Posts
    532

    The S-10 frame or better yet the Blazer frame , which is boxer & does not have the kick-up behind the cab will work in certain applications. The early fords are not amoung them.

    One of the application I am thinking of is the 47-54 Chevy/GMC 1/2 ton.

    Having said that they hardly never look just right because of their narrow front track.

    There is even a outfit that makes a kit for this application.
    Don Meyer, PhD-Mech Engr(48 GMC Trk/chopped/cab extended/caddy fins & a GM converted Rolls Royce Silver Shadow).

  13. #13
    lakota is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Elmendorf (San Antonio)
    Car Year, Make, Model: 52 Ford F-1, 327 Chevy, S-10 frame
    Posts
    206

    The S-10 frame is great for some applications, but not all. They fit fine under a fat fendered rod (48-52), especially the fat fendered pick ups. What most rodders dont realize is that there is a flaired joint just before the rear kick up. The weld in this joint can be ground out, the frame pulled apart and lengthened or shortened as needed for the proper wheelbase, and rewelded. Yes, the engine mounts are set forward, but this can be changed also. A lot of times a rodder will get in a hurry and overlook little details like this.

    In the case of the first picture of the model A... WHAT WAS HE THINKING...It looks like he used an S-10 Blazer frame. I doubt if he ever measured anything. S-10 frames do not fit well under model T, A or B (1915-1933).

    In the second picture, that frame should've been extended another 4-6 inches, and lowered with reversed spindles ($29), and blocks ($12).

    I wouldn't use an S-10 Blazer frame, they're about a 100" wheelbase and are 8" higher from the ground. Even with lowering it would still make a rod look like an "off roader".

    By the way...S-10s come in three wheelbases:

    Shortbed...108"
    Longbed....117"
    Ext Cab......122"
    Last edited by lakota; 12-30-2005 at 02:42 PM.
    52 Ford F-1, 327 Chevy, S-10 frame

    My website:
    www.geocities.com/lakota_circle_dancer/swap1

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink