Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Cruise-O-Matic
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    tyler's Avatar
    tyler is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    gainesville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1973 porsche 914 283 v8 '65 Galaxie 406
    Posts
    335

    Cruise-O-Matic

     



    please excuse my ignorance regarding ford transmissions. i have a 1965 galaxie with a 352. it has a cruise-o-matic transmission. i have been told that this is a c4 tranny and i have also been told that it is a c6. and i have read that it is not either and that is was a transmission of its own. im not sure what to beleive so i figured i would ask here. also how will a cruise-o-matic handle power? will it take some abuse or will i have problems with it breaking all of the time, i dont plan on building an extremely crazy motor but i do want to take the car to the drag strip to have some fun on friday nights, will this make a good tranny for me or should i get a c4 or c6?
    Honda Motor= 1.6L
    Soda Bottle= 2L




  2. #2
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    They were the predecessor of the C-4 and C-6, they won't take much abuse. Might be better off looking for a C-6, as heavy as the Galaxies are the C-4 would be a bit on the light side unless you spend a bunch of money beefing it up. The C-6 with just a shift kit IMO would work fine for you.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  3. #3
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    Cruisomatics actully are C4's, an early version of the C4 but, they are C4's none the less. I have a C4 in my '67 Falcon, and it has cruisomatic printed on the shift indicator. it took me a while to figure out what they trully were, Dearborn Classics dosen't list them on there vehicle options list on the order forms, just 3spd manual, 4spd manual, C4 or FMX.
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  4. #4
    tyler's Avatar
    tyler is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    gainesville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1973 porsche 914 283 v8 '65 Galaxie 406
    Posts
    335

    am i going to have problems from this trasmission if i do an ocassional burnout or something to that effect?
    Honda Motor= 1.6L
    Soda Bottle= 2L




  5. #5
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    Originally posted by tyler
    am i going to have problems from this trasmission if i do an ocassional burnout or something to that effect?
    it wouldn't hurt to upgrade to a C6, if the C4 you have works ok and everything, it should be fine for a while, if you burn out, I'd be leary of doing it with an open rear end ( non posi, 1 wheel spins ) because it is hard on the spiders and can spin out the rear if enough tire burning has been done. just remember to add type F fluid to it, Dexron/Mecron 3 will kill it if mixed, or you could rebuild and use Dexron/ Mecron 3
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  6. #6
    junkyardjeff's Avatar
    junkyardjeff is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Dayton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 37 chevy p/u 55 ford convertable
    Posts
    629

    The cruise-o-matics are basicly the same trans from 51 to 78,the 50s versions were the ford-o-matics then the cruise-o-matics and in the late 60s to the end I think in 78 were called the FMX. They are not bad trans just heavy and with a valve body change can be made to do the 1-2-D up and down shifts as the 65s had the green dots on the indicator and can be manually upshifted but not like the later versions. A C-6 would be better but if you are just only going to drive it normally your trans should work just fine. Jeff

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink