-
01-30-2007 01:02 PM #46
And You Will Need One Of TheseOld guy hot rodder
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
01-30-2007 01:22 PM #47
And it all goes together like this---Last edited by brianrupnow; 01-30-2007 at 04:08 PM.
Old guy hot rodder
-
01-30-2007 02:59 PM #48
I have went back and edited todays posts. I found that the suicide mount alone will only drop the front end 2 1/2", so I have added a Z to the frame rails to drop them an additional 2 1/2" at the front of the car. This will give a total drop of 5" using an original model A axle and spring. I would not attempt to drop it any deeper, because then you will run into clearance issues between the engine oilpan and the ground.Last edited by brianrupnow; 01-30-2007 at 04:47 PM.
Old guy hot rodder
-
02-03-2007 12:49 PM #49
Today I am going to cover some "weird science"---namely, how to determine the height of frame kickup in the rear of a Z'd frame. This is always a big question, and it is determined by how much the rear springs are going to compress under the weight of body, frame, engine, and passengers. I have spent a bit of time designing a "jig" which can be used to determine the height of a compressed rear spring. Your "Jig" doesn't have to be as fancy as the one I designed, but you can see the principals involved here. The Yellow frame must be bolted to something solid--preferably the cement floor, as we don't want things to fall over and break your leg. The light blue frame must pivot at the end which is attached to the yellow frame, and be attached to the upper eye of the coilover shock, and it MUST be horizontal to the floor, when there is no load on the coilover shock. The coilover shock MUST be setting vertically, and be attached with a cross-rod or bolt to the yellow frame at the bottom end, so it can pivot.---so we end up with 3 connections that can pivot. The weight shown can be anything you want it to be---bags of grain, peices of lead, old engine block, even a couple of fat girlfriends.---the only 'rule" is that the weight must be pretty well centered over the shock. On most 1930 era hotrods, the total weight on the rear axle is 1000 pounds. So since we are dealing with only one shock here, we will make the weight equal to 500 pounds. If the coil-over shock has adjustable weight settings, set it on its "lightest weight setting. (that way, if the back of your hotrod is heavier, then you can set it higher when it is installed). So----first measure the center to center of eyes on the shock with no load on it. Then, add the 500 pounds of weight---Then again measure the center of center of the "eyes".---(Do not let your fat girlfriends fall on your head while you are doing this). By this simple "procedure, you will be able to design the kickup in your frame rails much more accurately, so that the car will set at the "angle of rake" that you want to achieve when the car is finished. Another very good building trick is to build a couple of "dummy" coil-overs from some solid rod and tubing, with the eye to eye measurement being equal to the compressed height of the coil-overs, and use them as you build up the chassis and body and engine package, to always give you a correct "visual" on what your ride height is going to look like.Last edited by brianrupnow; 02-03-2007 at 12:53 PM.
Old guy hot rodder
-
02-04-2007 06:19 AM #50
Very nice tech article! you really should send it to a magazine, many rodders could use this info. I am doing a 30 A PU myself ,an old 60's drag/hotrod restoration -here is one suspension that was in vouge at the time my truck was built ,many of the A/FX drag cars and gassers of the time used this set up, SWC ,Geo. Montgomery etc.. I will keep it tho it is out of favor now-
The quater elliptic set up-
sorry about the pics - its CCCCold on that MN garage floor and the truck was still dirty from the road - MO to MN in an ice storm.
-
02-11-2007 03:09 PM #51
This is a car I am designing for a gentleman in North Carolina. It is a model A sedan, chopped 4". He has purchased a Speedway Motors complete front end with 6" dropped axle, a set of Carerra coil over shocks, which end up 11 1/8" center to center of eyes when compressed under a weight of 500 pounds each (he built the jig shown earlier in this thread to determine that dimension). The wheels are 15", diameter and the outside diameters shown are measured from my own roadster pickup. He plans on channeling the body 4" over the frame, and I have advised him to extend the wheelbase as shown, in order to allow fitting a small block chev engine with HEI distributor into place, with a 4" recess in the firewall. The drawing is "to scale" and I hav a few comments to make, based on what I am seeing. #1---I don't really like a 6" dropped front axle---why---well, the batwing welded to the axle (which the hairpin radius rods attach to) hangs down about 3 1/4" below the axle centerline. If you use a tire of the diameter I am showing, then the underside of that batwing is only about 2 3/8" off the ground.---This is not a problem when going over speed-bumps, as the tire will lift the axle up when you drive over one. The big danger is that if you blow a front tire and it comes off the rim, you will lose all steering and control, and go sliding down the road on the underside of the batwing.
#2---The design, as I have it, allows about 4 3/4" clearance between the top of the rear axle housing and the underside of the framerails. You need this much to avoid "bottoming out" when you hit a bump.---BUT---you can see what is happening with the kickup, when its that large. There is no way to run a back seat in that sedan. Now to a lot of folks, that don't matter---I just wanted to point out what you give up to have a channeled and low model A hotrod. #3---look where the pinion centerline ends up, on the rearend---yes, it is above the framerail and above the "floor" of the car. This means that the fellow is going to have to run a driveshaft tunnel full length of the passenger compartment, in a car which is pretty damn narrow to start with!!! #4---The motor is going to have to set up high in the frame, in order to keep the transmission output shaft from being way lower than the pinion centerline---this will mean that a huge transmission tunnel will also encroach on the pasenger compartment. #5---This car will look absolutely killer. It will get a lot of attention wherever it goes, and is the absolute epitome of what hotrods are supposed to look like. It will be uncomfortable as Hell for long distance driving, because you will end up with very little seat cushion, so will be driving around with your legs pretty well straight out but man, will you ever look cool while doing it. ---BrianOld guy hot rodder
-
02-11-2007 03:37 PM #52
Brian,
I hope people are using this information and appreciate what you are giving them. It can save them from making so many mistakes and costs. Great stuff!
Ken
-
02-11-2007 05:45 PM #53
This is a picture of the 'jig" that the fellow in North Carolina built to see what length his coilover shock would be center to center with a 500 pound load on it. He welded a 48" long peice of 2 x 2 square tube directly above the top of the shock, at 90 degrees to the top arm, and then got his 250 pound wife to set on one side of it, and his 250 pound girlfriend to set on the other side. The only trouble he had was when he got down on his knees between them to measure the length of the shock with the weight on it----Old guy hot rodder
-
02-11-2007 06:43 PM #54
I do this a lot different than you do. I wish I could write as well as you do to explain it. I'm afraid all I would do is confuse people.
-
02-11-2007 06:52 PM #55
Seems like a lot of engineering to me.... If the height is too low to make up for it with spring adjustment, get a stronger spring....
I have a pair of solid bars set to the mid point of the coilover travel, then when the car is a roller I mock up the components and ballast to equal the total finished weight, set it on the scales and call QA-1 to get the right rate spring... The techs do this stuff for a living and are good at it, so I use their knowledge. Maybe that's taking the easy way out?????
I like scaling them, that's probably the dirt tracker coming out in me though.
The engineering looks great for the sedan, Brian. Going to be a nice car even if IMO the BBC is going to make getting the front to rear weight anywhere's near right. Hopefully he's using a lot of aluminum components on the engine?????Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
02-11-2007 07:02 PM #56
Dave---Your probably right---but the guy has this stuff bought and paid for already. He says he can't return it, and he has never built a complete hotrod before. He's in North Carolina---I'm up in Canada. He is using the engine stock, out of his wrecked shop truck. The guy got all excited about building a hotrod, and with nobody to give him guidance, rushed out and bought a bunch of the wrong stuff. I'm just trying to help make the best of a bad situation---plus the fact that I have no real work anyways right now, so its helping me put the time in.---Brian.Old guy hot rodder
-
02-11-2007 07:06 PM #57
Mighty good of you to help him out, Brian!!!!! As in another thread discussing whether or not Hot Rodding will continue to grow, I guess I feel a responsibility to help others new to the game. Not by ridicule or it's my way or the highway but by thoughtful discussion and you might want to try!!!! Congrats and thanks for taking the time to help the man out of his dilema!!!! We all should be doing what we can to promote Hot Rodding and ensure it's continuance, what you're doing is an excellent example of what the rest of us should try.....Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
03-13-2007 06:12 PM #58
To put it simply: THANK YOU!
I stumbled across your post and I must say you've gone out of your way to be helpful. Thank you good sir!Last edited by dreddybear; 09-30-2009 at 03:17 PM.
-
04-07-2007 09:12 AM #59
I saved lots of time and money by welding the rear frame of a 77 Courier to my rails. I left everything stock except removed a leaf spring from each side to smooth the ride a bit. Replaced the rear axle assembly with a Ford 9" and have 10,000 trouble free miles. Every rodder I talked to plus a bunch of non-rodders (and what do they know) said it would never work and that it had to be a transverse spring or coil set up. The car has a 23 T body with 32 grill. Front suspension is mail order Speedway 32 Ford stuff with hairpins and cross spring. Only stuff still on car from the Courier is the radiater which handles the heat from my over cammed 350 quite well and the 16 gallon gas tank. I have a 4 foot bed on the back and the front axle is positioned to resemble a 32 frame. (I didn't have the dough for a modedl A body but wanted the car to look like one.) By the way, I paid a hundred bucks for the Courier and sold the engine and the remaining scrap for two hundred. Kinda like getting paid to install that "never work" suspension. Email for pics if your interested.
-
04-07-2007 02:37 PM #60
Kermit--Why don't you post the pictures here. It sounds interesting, and if you post it, then everyone can have a look.---brianOld guy hot rodder
Welcome to Club Hot Rod! The premier site for
everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more.
- » Members from all over the US and the world!
- » Help from all over the world for your questions
- » Build logs for you and all members
- » Blogs
- » Image Gallery
- » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts!
YES! I want to register an account for free right now! p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show
I wanted to complain about this NZ slang business, but I see it was resolved before it mattered. LOL..
the Official CHR joke page duel