Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: S-10 frame under 1947 ford sedan
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 26 of 26
  1. #16
    Rasmith1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    manchester
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1964 galaxie and a 1947 ford sedan
    Posts
    13

    well i would rather keep it all ford cause i am going to run a ford motor and trans..My frame is alittle ruff in the back but it seems that it is going to be more easy to fix it then put the s-10 frame under it.

  2. #17
    ponchotom89 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    East Aurora
    Posts
    10

    Hombre,The truck with the S10 frame under it had to have suspension mods done to it. Mine is completely stock with (stock)aftermarket shocks and it travels down the road just fine.In fact I think it has beefed up rear springs because when you hit a bump in the road it hits pretty hard other than that it rides nicely.Did the truck you`re referring to have fenders?If it didnt, the suspension and steering gear does look bad out in the open.

  3. #18
    ponchotom89 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    East Aurora
    Posts
    10

    Rasmith, do you plan on channeling your 47? Because if you are,you`ll at least be cutting the floor loose. Good time to drop your body on the frame.But if you want to keep it all Ford,you would have to use a Ranger frame. I`ve saw it done, under a 40 ford coupe, complete with the dual I beam axles.the owner said it worked just fine.

  4. #19
    Rasmith1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    manchester
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1964 galaxie and a 1947 ford sedan
    Posts
    13

    no not going to channel it

  5. #20
    Hombre259's Avatar
    Hombre259 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Out in The Country
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 Chevy 210-57 Chevy 2 dr wagon-48 Ford
    Posts
    374

    Ponchotom, Listen man I am glad you like your conversion, and its cool that it works for you. You have a favorable opinion of the S-10 frame. Thats cool with me.

    I on the other hand don't think it is the way to go. Most certainly not on a Fat Fendered Ford or anytime that the factory frame can be used or modified or changed in some way. Anytime you do that "I" think you are way ahead of the game. Thats my opinion.

    Now with that said and after reading some of the post on this subject and went and did some research looking for some of these "Frame Conversions". I found several, some OK, some really bad ones, but none that "I" cared for. Except for this one, this is without a doubt one of the coolest little Hot Rods I have ever seen and it has a frame from a Toyota.

    Shame on me!!
    Attached Images
    Protected people will never know or understand the intensity life can be lived at. To do that you must complettly and totally understand the meaning of the word "DUCK"

  6. #21
    TooMany2count's Avatar
    TooMany2count is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Cahokia
    Car Year, Make, Model: 48 Chevy 1ton Bus
    Posts
    2,498

    Look through THIS POST on S10 frame swaps, there are over 900 replies to it & I'm sure you'll find any info you need....joe
    Donate Blood,Plasma,Platelets & sign your DONORS CARD & SAVE a LIFE

    Two possibilities exist:
    Either we are alone in the Universe or we are not.
    Both are equally terrifying.
    Arthur C. Clarke

  7. #22
    ponchotom89 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    East Aurora
    Posts
    10

    Hombre that does look like a real cool rod. here`s some pix of mine
    Attached Images

  8. #23
    Hombre259's Avatar
    Hombre259 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Out in The Country
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 Chevy 210-57 Chevy 2 dr wagon-48 Ford
    Posts
    374

    TooMany2Count, Thanks (I think) for that post and that link to that thread on the Hamb. I say (I think) because I didn't see that link until pretty late, and right before I headed to the sack. If you notice the time, I am posting this after reading every word on all 47 pages of that thread.

    That was quite a read. Some damn interesting projects going on with the S-10 Chassis. Funny thing about that thread and that was the fact that a lot of those guys simply had to find an excuse to and for using the S-10 frame. The fact that it fit pretty good and was easly modified to fit when it didn't, was just not good enough. They felt guilty almost for using the thing. The most used EXCUSE was it may not be traditional but this is what Hot Rodding is all about uising what you got or can find cheap and making "IT" work.

    That never was what Hot Rodding was about. Hot Rodding as we refere to it now was about making each and every piece on your car better, and more efficiant. Making do was not what it was about.

    So after looking at and reading those 47 pages my opinion has been changed some. I think I was blaming the fact it was a S-10 and not looking at just how well built and useable that little frame is. The parts look pretty good indeed and I would take a little bet better look at this "NOW" before I just dismissed it.

    Ponchotom, Very cool little coupe you have there. Hows about giving us a little more information about it. One thing for sure I think it must be bagged to set that low. Details man details!!

    Roland
    Protected people will never know or understand the intensity life can be lived at. To do that you must complettly and totally understand the meaning of the word "DUCK"

  9. #24
    ponchotom89 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    East Aurora
    Posts
    10

    OK Hombre,You asked for it, 1. no it is not bagged, just didnt cut the grass. 2.when my brother gave me the coupe (in89)the body was scrap metal. the whole lower quarter was rotted away.Took it apart and contemplated on how I wanted to build it for 10 years.3.In 1999 found a running S10(drove it home)for $75.4.Spent the next 5 years setting it on theS10 frame and repairing the body.I used the following from the S10:frame(with front and rear susp),diff.,700R4 trans,wiring harness,pickup bed and wheelwells,steering col.,master cyl,brake pedal,and some body panels.the rest of the S10 I sold to fund building the car.After selling the S10 and old Pontiac parts I didnt need, the build cost me $3000 including $250 for a set of new ww radial tires.I had so much fun building it as well as finding GREAT bargains, I started another one.This one will be a 37 Ford sedan rat rod.

  10. #25
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    Quote Originally Posted by Hombre259 View Post
    Well it looks like I hit an unpopular spot with my criticism of the S-10 chassis. well thats OK, I like a difference of opinion. However with that said I just don't like the S-10 frame conversion's. I also don't have a lot of experiance with them. Only have first hand knowledge of one and it was not a Fat Fendered Ford it was a 47 Chevy chopped and channled pick-up, and while the feller that did the conversion was a pretty good fabricator it was a big mess. There was very little to like about this truck the ride was just bad, it That S-10 Frame looked like hell under a hot rod, there was almost nothing to like about it.

    And so when advising anyone considering a conversion based on the S-10 I am going to give my opinion, just like you folks did. And for a Fat Fendered Ford ( which I own one of ) I personally think it is a really bad choice.

    Roland
    Hombre, you are not alone in your opinion about using an S-10 frame. It is a lot of work to make one fit; the ones I have seen have a stance that does not look right (although Ponchotom's looks pretty cool); and some people, including me, would never buy a vehicle that had this kind of a conversion, no matter how good the craftsmanship might be. IMHO, you are money ahead using the original frame, but it all comes down to "it is your car and you have the freedom to do what you want with it."
    Last edited by rumrumm; 03-04-2009 at 08:02 AM.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  11. #26
    ponchotom89 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    East Aurora
    Posts
    10

    Hey RUMRUM, Where the hell can you buy a full frame, differential,and trans for $75. How is it less work to Fabricate a frame or clip? I`m sorry but one has to spend gobs of money to build ANYTHING with the dependability and engineering behind it than a GENUINE GM frameBTW the way I got mine to sit the way it does is by channeling the body down over the frame.

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink