Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Rear suspension not even
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 21 of 21
  1. #16
    cffisher's Avatar
    cffisher is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Constantine
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 chevy 2 dr wagon
    Posts
    9,476

    Quote Originally Posted by HOSS429 View Post
    kinda old and confused go together
    I will not coment on that, oh wait, a a a, never mind
    Charlie
    Lovin' what I do and doing what I love
    Some guys can fix broken NO ONE can fix STUPID
    W8AMR
    http://fishertrains94.webs.com/
    Christian in training

  2. #17
    robot's Avatar
    robot is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tucson
    Car Year, Make, Model: 39 Ford Coupe, 32 Ford Roadster
    Posts
    2,334

    IF it were a monte frame, it would have coil spring pockets in the rear as part of the frame. If someone changed it to leaf springs, the sag is probably due either mismatched springs OR improper installation. If the frame is not a monte, it could have been tweaked in a wreck as posted earlier.

    A monte frame is a bit wide for an old car.....was the frame narrowed in the back? Did they get that part straight? Unless they had a surface plate/jig, it would be possible to have it warp if they narrowed the frame.

  3. #18
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    I'm kind of old ( 70) and got it together, but you guys are confused!!!

  4. #19
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Quote Originally Posted by rp23g7 View Post
    Hmm,\The previous owner probably got confused, he's kinda old and has 20 cars
    I resemble that comment, did I sell you the car??? If so, did you see my '73 Maverick, I lost it....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  5. #20
    dlotraf33's Avatar
    dlotraf33 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Georgetown
    Car Year, Make, Model: 48 Ford Truck
    Posts
    471

    It didn't dawn on me until I reread this thread, that the monte did originally have coil rear springs. We used those alot for stock cars. So with leaf on rear it has been modified or grafted. have you looked underneath at the frame to see what modifications were made. Unless they did a super job of fabrication, you should be able to see if the front crossmember was narrowed, if maybe a front sub was grafted to another frame. If any thing frame wise looks modified it may not be the springs but was not put together perfectly. If the frame looks unmodified the only thing gm that I can think of that might possibly fit would be maybe an S10, they have leaf in rear. The only other gm I can think of, other that 60's or 70's large gm, that has leaf rear is camaro and it doesn't have frame. If it looks solid and not cobbed together the solution may just be to shim one side of the rear to get it to sit proper. And the frame may be bent slightly. 1 degree in the right place will easily translate to an inch difference in corner heights.

  6. #21
    rp23g7's Avatar
    rp23g7 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Lynnwood
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1941 Chrysler Business Coupe Street Rod
    Posts
    47

    Quote Originally Posted by dlotraf33 View Post
    It didn't dawn on me until I reread this thread, that the monte did originally have coil rear springs. We used those alot for stock cars. So with leaf on rear it has been modified or grafted. have you looked underneath at the frame to see what modifications were made. Unless they did a super job of fabrication, you should be able to see if the front crossmember was narrowed, if maybe a front sub was grafted to another frame. If any thing frame wise looks modified it may not be the springs but was not put together perfectly. If the frame looks unmodified the only thing gm that I can think of that might possibly fit would be maybe an S10, they have leaf in rear. The only other gm I can think of, other that 60's or 70's large gm, that has leaf rear is camaro and it doesn't have frame. If it looks solid and not cobbed together the solution may just be to shim one side of the rear to get it to sit proper. And the frame may be bent slightly. 1 degree in the right place will easily translate to an inch difference in corner heights.
    i will check and see what i can find tomorrow
    Girls love Hot Rods too

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink