Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Rear suspension not even
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    I'm kind of old ( 70) and got it together, but you guys are confused!!!

  2. #2
    dlotraf33's Avatar
    dlotraf33 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Georgetown
    Car Year, Make, Model: 48 Ford Truck
    Posts
    471

    It didn't dawn on me until I reread this thread, that the monte did originally have coil rear springs. We used those alot for stock cars. So with leaf on rear it has been modified or grafted. have you looked underneath at the frame to see what modifications were made. Unless they did a super job of fabrication, you should be able to see if the front crossmember was narrowed, if maybe a front sub was grafted to another frame. If any thing frame wise looks modified it may not be the springs but was not put together perfectly. If the frame looks unmodified the only thing gm that I can think of that might possibly fit would be maybe an S10, they have leaf in rear. The only other gm I can think of, other that 60's or 70's large gm, that has leaf rear is camaro and it doesn't have frame. If it looks solid and not cobbed together the solution may just be to shim one side of the rear to get it to sit proper. And the frame may be bent slightly. 1 degree in the right place will easily translate to an inch difference in corner heights.

  3. #3
    rp23g7's Avatar
    rp23g7 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Lynnwood
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1941 Chrysler Business Coupe Street Rod
    Posts
    47

    Quote Originally Posted by dlotraf33 View Post
    It didn't dawn on me until I reread this thread, that the monte did originally have coil rear springs. We used those alot for stock cars. So with leaf on rear it has been modified or grafted. have you looked underneath at the frame to see what modifications were made. Unless they did a super job of fabrication, you should be able to see if the front crossmember was narrowed, if maybe a front sub was grafted to another frame. If any thing frame wise looks modified it may not be the springs but was not put together perfectly. If the frame looks unmodified the only thing gm that I can think of that might possibly fit would be maybe an S10, they have leaf in rear. The only other gm I can think of, other that 60's or 70's large gm, that has leaf rear is camaro and it doesn't have frame. If it looks solid and not cobbed together the solution may just be to shim one side of the rear to get it to sit proper. And the frame may be bent slightly. 1 degree in the right place will easily translate to an inch difference in corner heights.
    i will check and see what i can find tomorrow
    Girls love Hot Rods too

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink