Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: engine/trans shake when burning out
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 31 to 43 of 43
  1. #31
    sfort's Avatar
    sfort is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Allen
    Car Year, Make, Model: 46 Chevy Truck
    Posts
    528

    How much room do you have with the yoke going into the transmission? Are you getting movement of the rear end clockwise and bottoming out the drive shaft?

  2. #32
    1gary is offline Banned Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Roch
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1985 high top Astro van
    Posts
    2,520

    Not for nothing,but the off road/monster truckers have proven that you don't have to have the drive line in line with each other as long as it is the same degree angles under power.Looks weird as all get out,but I guess it works.
    Good Bye

  3. #33
    tcodi's Avatar
    tcodi is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    parkesburg
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1950 chevy pickup
    Posts
    580

    There is a lot of slip room on the trans yoke. I forget exactly what I set it up with, but I just used a standard recommended amount, I'd guess maybe 1.5 inches or so.
    Now I'm trying to post a current pic with sway bar and all.

  4. #34
    tcodi's Avatar
    tcodi is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    parkesburg
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1950 chevy pickup
    Posts
    580

    IMG_2921.JPG

    very difficult to see everyting in this pic, I had the bed hanging from my garage roof trusses right above my head when I was doing this work, so it was impossible to get a good picture.

  5. #35
    Dq383500's Avatar
    Dq383500 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Independence
    Posts
    140

    Nice set up, sorry to hear of the problems, I,ve built mine out of spare junk, and came out ok. I also was wondering about the yoke travel distance. 1.5 seems like a lot but may be correct, I would imagine that would change with suspension travel which I would assume you do not use alot of. Like you its been awhile since I set mine up., all I did was add a gear vendors, shortened driveshaft, etc. now don't hold me to this, but I believe the yoke travel was setup at .75. Maybe it is as mentioned before driveshaft wrap up if that is even possible.Anyways just following this thread. Interesting.

  6. #36
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    11,147

    I could be wrong, but that panhard bar is really going to put things in a bind as you get any suspension movement. If it is set up neutral at static ride height, considering the arc of travel it is going to pull the center of the rear end over toward the drivers side putting your triangulated 4-link joints in a considerable bind. I don't believe it has anything to do with this shake problem, but I believe that you introduced a new problem by installing that panhard bar, just my opinion.
    If it were mine I would drop the tranny and check the clutch for evidence of chatter, and the pilot bearing to be sure your needle bearings aren't toasted.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  7. #37
    pro70z28's Avatar
    pro70z28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    CC
    Car Year, Make, Model: 70 Camaro Z-28 Now/40 Chevy Back Then
    Posts
    4,306

    Probably not part of your vibration problem, but the panhard bar seems short. Looks like it could cause the rear end to move side to side as the suspension goes through it's travel.
    "PLAN" your life like you will live to 120.
    "LIVE" your life like you could die tomorrow.

    John 3:16
    >>>>>>

  8. #38
    pro70z28's Avatar
    pro70z28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    CC
    Car Year, Make, Model: 70 Camaro Z-28 Now/40 Chevy Back Then
    Posts
    4,306

    Roger you beat me to it. lol
    "PLAN" your life like you will live to 120.
    "LIVE" your life like you could die tomorrow.

    John 3:16
    >>>>>>

  9. #39
    tcodi's Avatar
    tcodi is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    parkesburg
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1950 chevy pickup
    Posts
    580

    well your absolutely right about that panhard binding during suspension travel. As you can see in that photo it isn't even bolted up in that position because the suspension is all the way down since I had it on stands working on it, and it's arc is so far off at that point I can't even connect it. I set it up though with the suspension up at ride height, so then when I went to finish the job I couldn't even get the bolt through without actually setting the bed on the frame again and then squeezing under the vehicle and putting the bolt through from there.
    That's another reason I wanted to switch to heim ends on those links. At first I didn't and I put that panhard on and used a jack to push the axle through it's travel range and watched the joints. They were twisting so hard at maximum travel I was worried I'd fatigue them and end up snapping one off some day on the road.
    I really just put the panhard on there because I was out of ideas of what to do and I thought if that helped stabilize the rear more it couldn't hurt.

  10. #40
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    11,147

    I would definitely take the panhard bar out and leave it out. The purpose of the triangulated 4-link is to ensure no side movement of the rear end, so you're just causing yourself problems by adding that bar, and doubling the potential binding by making it so short. As a point of reference, my Jeep has OEM "track bars" which is just their name for a panhard, and they run from the frame rail on one side, extending all the way to the most extreme point on the axle tube to minimize side travel on articulation. They're necessary because the suspension is parallel links, and one is anchored driver's side, the other passenger side to offset the side shift of the axles on the road, to maintain tracking to the extent possible.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  11. #41
    34_40's Avatar
    34_40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Bedford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford 3W Coupe Replica
    Posts
    14,703

    Grasping at a straw here but.... Inspect the slip yoke on the driveshaft.. check for damaged or broken splines.
    If ok, head in for the clutch.

  12. #42
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Plenty of angle on the upper bars, all the panhard bar is doing is creating one more potential bind, as Rog mentioned.....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  13. #43
    ojh
    ojh is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Berryville
    Posts
    486

    Everthing looks pretty much hunky-dory to me back there. I think 'rspears' made a good suggestion.

Reply To Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink