12Likes
Thread: Dakota vs Ram
-
01-26-2014 03:13 PM #1
Dakota vs Ram
I'm building a 39 Dodge pickup. At this stage I'm ready to pickup a donor truck motor and trans. I'm going to stick with a mopar setup, but I'm a newby at anything mopar. I'd like to stick with a 318 or 360 with an auto for good cruising. My question is - are there any big advantages to either the Dakota or the full size Ram? Also if I find a good unit with 4x4,how much trouble am I running into to keep just a 2 wheel drive? I'm using the stock frame,sheet metal,etc. Sorry to be so long winded. Thanks for ANY help I can get.
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
01-26-2014 03:54 PM #2
Given the choice of 381 (5.21L) or 360 (5.9L) I'd go with the 5.9L, but why not consider a late model Hemi? A takeout with engine, tranny, wiring & computer is easy to find, given the wide range of applications that use them (Jeep, Charger, Challenger, others). If you're wanting to go the donor truck route to get more than the engine & tranny, you don't want a 4x4. The transmission in the 4X4 is built to interface to the transfer case, giving outputs to both rear and front differential. To change it to 2WD you'd have to swap out the tailshaft unit to get rid of the transfer case interface.Roger
Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.
-
01-26-2014 04:43 PM #3
Thanks for the info Roger. I hadnt given it a lot thought about the hemi,but I will do some measuring and see if it would fit. I like the idea. I kinda figured that a 4x4 would give me a hassle with T-cases and such. It just looks wide to me,but I have not done any research or measuring on one. With a 318 or 360, I've seen other mopar small blocks done in some older dodge trucks,so I know it will work. But its been quite a while ago and I've forgotten the details. Wish I were younger!!!
-
01-26-2014 04:48 PM #4
Pretty sure the Dakota 318 was the same engine as the Ram 318 so it probably does not matter.. The Dakota R/T had the 5.9L which may have had a little more punch than the Ram being it was a sport truck.You don't know what you've got til it's gone
Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver
1967 Ford Falcon- Sold
1930's styled hand built ratrod project
1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold
-
01-26-2014 05:32 PM #5
A 318 is a 318 regardless what it sits in, and it's the same engine that we had back in the '60's with some upgrades for emissions requirements. Both the 318 and the 360 topped out in OEM trim at 230HP, but the 360 gave you 325ft lbs vs 280ft lbs from the 318. Torque is what you feel in the seat of your pants, so the 360 is a better choice if you can't go Hemi - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ram_(truck)Roger
Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.
-
01-27-2014 06:56 AM #6
The 318 is the most reliable engine ever made, you can't go wrong with one. As for the 4X4 trans, you have to swap out the tail shaft and housing, which requires total disassembly. Not worth the effort when 2wd trucks are common. I would go for the 360 myself, as stated, more torque and power.
-
01-27-2014 08:19 AM #7
Hemi, Hemi, Hemi, Hemi
-
01-28-2014 03:33 AM #8
I did a same vintage sedan with the 5.7 Hemi, fits fine. Things do get a bit tight around the front of the engine to the hood sides. Stock frame rails, added the crossmembers and boxing plates. Good fit and great power!!!!Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
01-28-2014 07:17 AM #9
Good lookin' chassis & engine there, Dave! Like Jerry said, Go Hemi!!Roger
Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.
-
09-29-2014 06:11 PM #10
notice this thread is a few months old but to clarify If its a 4spd auto behind the 5.2/5.9 you do not need to tear the whole trany down to convert it to 2wd its just a matter of unbolting the overdrive/tailhousing and swap it out for a 2wd version
-
10-06-2014 06:20 PM #11
Sorry,5.9, that doesn't work. the output shafts are different, 2WD to 4WD. Been there, tried that!
-
10-07-2014 01:24 PM #12
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Prairie City
- Car Year, Make, Model: 40 Ford Deluxe, 68 Corvette, 72&76 K30
- Posts
- 7,297
- Blog Entries
- 1
The trans in the pic behind that Hemi isn't a RH, and sure doesn't look like a 46re either. So the above post is probably true. But in a 46rh, 47rh, or 518, and even the 46re, 47re, they interchange. Which as 5.9desoto posted the 4 speed autos behind the 5.2 and 5.9's, you can swap the OD housings from 2wd to 4wd. You can not swap the OD housing from a RE to RH and vice versa. The RE's OD housing is shorter than the RH's and 518's.
The intermediate shaft is the same on them and the planetary gear set in the OD assembly slides on and is splined to the intermediate shaft. The output shaft is seperate and not an issue. You literally remove the OD housing bolts and slide the OD assembly off the intermediate shaft. There is a metal snap ring on the intermediate shaft that can cause some resistance, but that is pretty much the jist of them.Last edited by 40FordDeluxe; 10-07-2014 at 01:34 PM.
Ryan
1940 Ford Deluxe Tudor 354 Hemi 46RH Electric Blue w/multi-color flames, Ford 9" Residing in multiple pieces
1968 Corvette Coupe 5.9 Cummins Drag Car 11.43@130mph No stall leaving the line with 1250 rpm's and poor 2.2 60'
1972 Chevy K30 Longhorn P-pumped 24v Compound Turbos 47RH Just another money pit
1971 Camaro RS 5.3 BTR Stage 3 cam, SuperT10
Tire Sizes
-
10-19-2014 08:24 AM #13
The trans output shaft, that drives the OD, has a different part # in a 4WD trans. The Mopar mechanics all insist that it won't work, but it does seem a tad strange that they would make them different just for the four by four.
I wanted to complain about this NZ slang business, but I see it was resolved before it mattered. LOL..
the Official CHR joke page duel