9Likes
Thread: What Explorer 8.8 rear should I be looking for?
-
03-07-2018 12:27 PM #1
What Explorer 8.8 rear should I be looking for?
I'm looking to slip an 8.8 disc brake rearend under my sedan. What years are recommended, and which should I steer clear of? I'll be running a stock 5.3/4L60e in front of it.
Thanks for any input.
-Red
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
03-07-2018 02:19 PM #2
I’m running the same engine/trans combo in my 48 Plymouth and I used an 8.8 from a 2000 Mercy Mountaineer ( same as Explorer). Mine came with factory 4:10 gears disc brakes, and limited slip.1 Corinthians 1:27
-
03-07-2018 02:25 PM #3
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Prairie City
- Car Year, Make, Model: 40 Ford Deluxe, 68 Corvette, 72&76 K30
- Posts
- 7,297
- Blog Entries
- 1
Here's one of the places I used for info when I was trying to decide which one I wanted to use. I ended up getting a 98 up explorer one. It wouldn't work with stock rear fenders for my car but I already had wider rear fenders and it fits great. Fitting the triangulated 4 link is taking some extra work due to the offset of the center.
The Ford Explorer 8.8-Inch Axle Swap
Here is another link to help you identify what gears and if it is or isn't a LS if you go looking in the junk yard too.
Ford 7.5 & 8.8 Inch Axle Tag & Door Codes
I really wanted a 3.55 but couldn't find one so I went with a 3.73 instead.Last edited by 40FordDeluxe; 03-07-2018 at 02:29 PM.
Ryan
1940 Ford Deluxe Tudor 354 Hemi 46RH Electric Blue w/multi-color flames, Ford 9" Residing in multiple pieces
1968 Corvette Coupe 5.9 Cummins Drag Car 11.43@130mph No stall leaving the line with 1250 rpm's and poor 2.2 60'
1972 Chevy K30 Longhorn P-pumped 24v Compound Turbos 47RH Just another money pit
1971 Camaro RS 5.3 BTR Stage 3 cam, SuperT10
Tire Sizes
-
03-07-2018 09:23 PM #4
Mine is a 2000 Explorer with a 5.3 and 4l60e. I also have 3.73 gears like most of them have and it cruises great down the road. The offset is a bit of a pain like Ryan said but their cheap enough where it makes it worth it.Seth
God cannot give us a happiness and peace apart from Himself, because it is not there. There is no such thing. C.S.Lewis
-
03-08-2018 02:36 AM #5
Keep in mind that the Explorer/Mountaineer axles can be narrowed around 3" pretty easily. Like most of the 9" Ford rears, they have a long and short axle. You can get another short side axle pretty cheap even if you buy a new replacement. Just cut the tube on the long side of the housing to fit the shorter axle and your good. This trick was used on 9" axle for a quick easy narrow job.
On the 8.8, this will move the pinion closer to the center, too.
If my memory is correct, you would wind up at around 56" overall width (wheel mount to wheel mount) with the short side swap.Last edited by Hotrod46; 03-08-2018 at 02:39 AM.
Mike
I seldom do anything within the scope of logical reason and calculated cost/benefit, etc-
I'm following my passion
-
03-08-2018 09:32 AM #6
1995-2001 are all the same. 3.73 and 4.10 available ratio's. V8's had extra traction bars and trac lock was standard but V8/V6 does not matterYou don't know what you've got til it's gone
Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver
1967 Ford Falcon- Sold
1930's styled hand built ratrod project
1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold
-
03-09-2018 10:07 PM #7
-
03-11-2018 01:43 PM #8
Just got home. Drove about 60 miles north this morning to pick up my rearend, almost to Canada, but not quite.
Brought home a 3.73, limited slip 8.8 out of a '99 Explorer. Has all the brakes, shocks, brackets and Trac bar stuff with it. Seller was even nice enough to let me go through his stash of lug nuts to find a full set for it because it didn't have any when he got it. All in all, very happy with my latest find.
Well us Kiwis talk English proper. Try this one: . I've lately joined a Dating Site for arsonists. I'm just waiting for a match now. .
the Official CHR joke page duel