Thread: Dead PERCH
-
10-18-2004 07:43 PM #1
Dead PERCH
Hey guys, quick question.
With respect to a "dead perch". If I use one of these items do I need a Front Panhard bar. Are they, one or the other, items?
Also which one is better?
Cheers
Webby"Those who know not and know not that they know not; are fools, AVOID THEM. Those who know not and know that they know not, are intelligent, EDUCATE THEM".
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
10-18-2004 08:18 PM #2
One or the other but not both. I know why but I can not explain it.An Old California Rodder
Hiding Out In The Ozarks
-
10-18-2004 08:42 PM #3
Thanks Bib, I suppose the result of having both fitted would be a "difference of two arcs".....if thats how you explain it. I currently have no mount for a Panhard on my chassis so i guess I will go for the dead perch. I am still wondering which one is better though. The dead perch just seems to easy.
webby"Those who know not and know not that they know not; are fools, AVOID THEM. Those who know not and know that they know not, are intelligent, EDUCATE THEM".
-
10-19-2004 11:03 AM #4
With a dead perch your main leaf acts as a panhard rod. In exteme situations the main leaf might not be as good as a panhard rod due to the fact that it flexes but I doubt you will ever notice the difference on the street. The dead perch is a cleaner looking installation too.
One other thing. You will get a tighter arc with the dead perch since it's funtional length is from the spring mount to the spring eye. If you made a panhard rod that was longer...say from the left bat wing to a mount under the right frame side rail you would lessen the arc. Less arc is a good thing as it reduces the amount the front axle will move sideways as it travels up and down.
Tom
For sure!! I recall Jim's torsion bar suspension on at least one of his builds, but I'm not sure which one! Maybe the Track T?? He's a talented builder.
30 Model A coupe build begins