Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 1st Gen Camaro Suspension Replacement
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Dan J's Avatar
    Dan J is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Memphis
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 Ford Tudor, '67 Camaro, '56 Bel Air
    Posts
    216

    1st Gen Camaro Suspension Replacement

     



    Has anybody used Heidt’s or TCI’s (or anyone else’s) bolt in 4-link rear suspension or the IFS front-end sub-frames? I’ve got a 67 Camaro (drum brakes & power steering) with totally worn out suspension (170,000 miles on original).

    http://www.heidts.com/heip43.htm#camframe
    http://www.totalcostinvolved.com/pro...fm?prodID=1422

    I’m about to do a major upgrade and refinish to the entire car, and will probably be dropping a few $$$ into this car’s finishes. I’m just wondering if the ride and handling performance will be worth the expense of these suspension replacement/upgrades. Or, should I just replace the existing springs and rebuild the original suspension?

    Thanks for any advice.

    Dan

  2. #2
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    I put a Heidts under a Camaro, but it was with an entire new frame and not the factory subframe setup. There are lots of good upgrades for the stock suspension too, good springs, A-Arms, coilovers, bushings, or anythine else you want to replace....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  3. #3
    halftanked is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Liberty
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1929 ford
    Posts
    504

    I just did a 69 camaro with a friend,replacing and up grading to polyurethane everywhere there was a kit for,new rotors,pads ,calipers,all the steering etc. For what it cost,and the time involved,you might better go with a front and rear kit,I liked the Height's front, and the TCI rear, add subframe connecters,and use an air ride system instead of coil-overs Hank

  4. #4
    Dan J's Avatar
    Dan J is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Memphis
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 Ford Tudor, '67 Camaro, '56 Bel Air
    Posts
    216

    Dave, how much better was the handling and ride on your Camaro after you did the swap? I guess you ended up with a new rack and pinion steering setup with the frame swap. Was your car a driver or were you racing?

    Hank, did you guys install anti-sway too?

    I know my Camaro’s suspension is shot... it feels like you’re riding in a canoe when you drive this rascal. The steering is slow; it rolls from side to side and has a really soft ride. Anything will be an improvement over what I’ve got now.

    I’m going to change out the drum brakes to power disk, and this will be getting into a few $$ for that upgrade. The disk brakes would be included with the Heidt’s package. If I rebuild the existing suspension and add anti-sway bars, I know I’ll be spending less than the new front clip and 4-link.

    Do you think the "performance" of the rebuilt original suspension (with anti-sway) is going to be considerably “less than” the new Heidt’s setup? I’d hate to save a few $$ and then regret the difference in handling and ride.

  5. #5
    nitrowarrior's Avatar
    nitrowarrior is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Mesa
    Posts
    1,385

    Dan, please fill us in on your planned use for this. These components are great ideas, but if it's a daily driver, might not be neccessary. Stock rebuilds still do well. Remember this set up was designed to give the buyer a feel to emulate the Mustang handling (because ford was kicking the road course's butt back then). Fill us in please. too many nice options to consider. We'ed like to help out.

  6. #6
    Dan J's Avatar
    Dan J is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Memphis
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 Ford Tudor, '67 Camaro, '56 Bel Air
    Posts
    216

    Nitro,

    This is going to be an 18 to 24 month “weekend” project. The idea is to get my son some experience with “old” cars, and maybe generate a little interest with his buddies too.

    The car will be my son’s daily driver for a couple of years after we've finished. My plan is to prep the car so that when dad gets it back from son, the 327 and automatic are pulled and replaced with something I can enjoy! I just want to get all of the suspension and brake work done before we start any of the “finish” work.

    I don’t plan to race the car when I get it back, but I’d like to have decent performance when I’m out “playing” with it. I'll also be making some long distance road trips to events.

    Dan

  7. #7
    halftanked is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Liberty
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1929 ford
    Posts
    504

    Dan, Yes the sway bar was up graded also. There's probably several other sub-frame kits out there also. Unless you want the bling-bling stuff, paint handles just as good as chrome,and slots and holes are ok for racing,but not really needed on the street.We did it just for fun,nobody was getting paid [although I did suck up lots of his beer] and He and I both agree that a new sub with better steering,brakes ,additional clearance for headers ,better ride,and eye appeal is hard to beat. Hank

  8. #8
    Dan J's Avatar
    Dan J is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Memphis
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 Ford Tudor, '67 Camaro, '56 Bel Air
    Posts
    216

    Thanks Hank,

    I like my stuff looking nice, but the underside just needs to be clean... no "bling-bling" necessary. I'm really trying to figure out if the improvement in performance and handling is going to be worth the extra $$. BTW, I do appreciate what you said about saving time and the extra clearance that will be afforded with the new subframe installation.

    Dan

  9. #9
    Bob Parmenter's Avatar
    Bob Parmenter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Salado
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32, 40 Fords,
    Posts
    10,869

    Okay Danny, one of my favorite things in life is helping a buddy spent HIS money!

    Given your described intent this might be helpful.

    Some good reading for you; http://www.camaros.net/forums/archiv....php/f-16.html

    Also check out Guldstrand Engineering, Dick has been doing this stuff "forever"; http://www.guldstrand.com/gss4.htm (then go to home page link at the bottom to navigate.

    Then plan on coming out in Nov to SEMA and we'll cruise the booths. I'll buy dinner, but bring your checkbook!!
    Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon

    It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.

    Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.

  10. #10
    Dan J's Avatar
    Dan J is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Memphis
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 Ford Tudor, '67 Camaro, '56 Bel Air
    Posts
    216

    Thanks Bob! Looks like a wealth of reading information.

    And hey, what’s a buddy for if he can’t help you spend your money... you’re a good man for volunteering to help me out! With all the help you’re trying to give me, I’d better get out there and water my money tree.

    SEMA sounds good, let’s make sure it happens this year.

    Dan

  11. #11
    SBC's Avatar
    SBC
    SBC is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Magnolia
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 Chevy Nova 283 4-spd
    Posts
    443

    I'm determined to make my Nova handle better with stock parts.

    Since you mentioned converting to 2nd gen stock front end -

    I'm curious as to opinions on the advantage of front steer over rear steer linkage.
    There is no limit to what a man can do . . . if he doesn't mind who gets the credit. (Ronald Reagan)

  12. #12
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan J
    Dave, how much better was the handling and ride on your Camaro after you did the swap? I guess you ended up with a new rack and pinion steering setup with the frame swap. Was your car a driver or were you racing?
    Very, Very much better!!! But, the entire frame was built out of 1 1/2" X 3" 11 gauge rectangular tubing complete with an 8 point roll bar, a cowl hoop, and front bars from the cowl hoop to the frame.... The existing floor of the Camaro was notched with the old floor welded to the new frame rails, then braces off the main hoop to the door latch area and braces from the cowl hoop to the door hinge area.... I used MII suspension with tubular A-Arms, coilovers, power rack and pinion, and 11" disc brakes and a 9" Ford rear end on coilovers with 9" disc brakes. Both ends of the car had anti-roll bars, the tubular ones with the adjustable end links.

    It was not a cheap or an easy project.... I built this for a customer 5 or 6 years ago. He drives it all summer every year and has racked up better then 20,000 miles on the car since it was done. It handles like a slot car and will stop on a dime!!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  13. #13
    Dan J's Avatar
    Dan J is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Memphis
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 Ford Tudor, '67 Camaro, '56 Bel Air
    Posts
    216

    Dave, your man had more coins in his fruit jar than I’ll be able to come up with! Sounds like you put together a really nice setup for your customer. I'd like to have the slot-car performance, but I'm not in that league yet.

    I’m sure the performance and handling is going to be better with the new clip and 4-link. I’ve just got to do more homework before I make up my mind... mainly, I’ve got to finish putting together my total budget for this project before I know which way to go.

    Thanks for the comments.

    Dan

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink