Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Clutch Linkage
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Ken Thurm's Avatar
    Ken Thurm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    orange
    Car Year, Make, Model: 4- 32 fords
    Posts
    1,609

    Clutch Linkage

     



    One of the problems in building the older cars is interior room. I like 3 pedals, so as hard as it is sometimes, and I create most of my own problems, I just like shifting these things.
    I have stretched the frame on my truck 3" in the front and 5" on my roadster, knowing there is going to be issues with room. With a 5" stretch it eliminates the problem, 3" does not. Then esthetic's comes into play, I think 5" in a roadster is acceptable but not in a truck, so 3" helps but doesn't eliminate the problem.
    One way to give yourself more room is to keep the clutch fork as low as possible on the bell housing and keep the fork as short as possible. So I use a scatter shield with the fork hole rotated down and make my own fork. (I wish Brian would write this maybe it would make more sense)
    I hope this helps Some one.
    Ken
    Attached Images
    Last edited by Ken Thurm; 02-27-2007 at 02:02 PM.

  2. #2
    Ken Thurm's Avatar
    Ken Thurm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    orange
    Car Year, Make, Model: 4- 32 fords
    Posts
    1,609

    The fork is 1 1/4" shorter, so I use a 3/4" bore on the slave cylinder and 7/8" bore on the master cylinder.
    Attached Images

  3. #3
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Looks great Ken!!! Is the pressure adequate with the shorter arm? I've gotten even lazier in my old age...... Eliminated the clutch fork all together and went with a hydraulic throw out bearing. Works great on race cars, should be fine on the street, too.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  4. #4
    Ken Thurm's Avatar
    Ken Thurm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    orange
    Car Year, Make, Model: 4- 32 fords
    Posts
    1,609

    Thanks Dave, I will post a shot of it when it's all cleaned up. I have used the hydraulic throw out bearings without to much success. I found if the car sat for any period of time it would roll the O ring off. I put this same set up in my red roadster and have driven it for a year now without any problems. Easy pedal pressure and plenty of travel.

  5. #5
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Good to hear, I've had the same situation arise on the hydraulic throwout bearings, might have to go back to a fork and slave cylinder. I did resolve the issue with some machine work and a larger O Ring. I really like the looks of the aluminum one you made, probably a lot more practical and trouble free for street use then the hydraulic. Hope you don't mind if I steal your idea... My only concern was if the cylinder's would create enough pressure to make everything work correctly, good to learn it all works ok.... Thanks.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  6. #6
    Ken Thurm's Avatar
    Ken Thurm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    orange
    Car Year, Make, Model: 4- 32 fords
    Posts
    1,609

    Here it is all done.It makes for a nice compact set up, for more interior foot room.
    Attached Images

  7. #7
    Ken Thurm's Avatar
    Ken Thurm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    orange
    Car Year, Make, Model: 4- 32 fords
    Posts
    1,609

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Severson
    Good to hear, I've had the same situation arise on the hydraulic throwout bearings, might have to go back to a fork and slave cylinder. I did resolve the issue with some machine work and a larger O Ring. I really like the looks of the aluminum one you made, probably a lot more practical and trouble free for street use then the hydraulic. Hope you don't mind if I steal your idea... My only concern was if the cylinder's would create enough pressure to make everything work correctly, good to learn it all works ok.... Thanks.
    I'll send you a drawing if you want.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink